A Partial List of Obama's Lies and Hypocrisy

-- It all started during the campaign when he vowed not to take public financing. He then went back on that promise.

-- He vowed in all earnestness that he would reject all earmarks. There are about 9000 earmarks in the current trillion-dollar projects going on right now.

-- He said there would be "transparency" in his administration. Anyone who dares to ask questions about the validity of some of the things he is doing, especially in reference to his "stimulus" bills, is shouted down in favor of the utter speed in which this must be passed NOW.

-- He said he would cut the deficit. He's doubled the deficit.

-- He promised "bipartisanship" - Most republicans are against his socialistic policies but he doesn't seem to care. He'd rather focus on demonizing Rush Limbaugh, who he must have just heard of even though he's been on the radio for 20+ years. How bipartisan.

-- He admonished America to "wear a sweater" when it gets cold to save on energy costs. According to reports, he cranks the heat in the oval office. When asked about it, a spokesman said "He's from Hawaii". Never mind he spent most of his adult life in New York and Chicago.

-- He claims to be "for the people". Meanwhile he's eating $100 a pound imported steak from Japan and Iranian caviar, and inviting Stevie Wonder and Earth Wind and Fire to play at the White House for his Wednesday parties. He also lives in a million-dollar house gotten in a crooked land deal with Tony Rezko.
Way to stay in touch with the "little people". The people he claims to be in favor of. I guess we see now where he really feels comfortable.

-- He vowed lobbyists "won't find a job in my white house"...well...at least some people in America have steady jobs now.

-- As far as gun control goes, he said he would "uphold the second amendment", but even in his first 50 days as president, with all the other problems at hand, he has made various gun bans a priority.

-- He chided John McCain when McCain said the economy might not be as bad as Obama is making it seem. Once the polling numbers came in, he then changed his tune to "the economy is not as bad as it seems".

-- He said now is "an end to childish things" - yet he and his snarky Clintonites are calling Republicans a bunch of "Limbaugh-lovers" like kids at differing lunchtables in elementary school.

-- He never stops talking about the value of public education and how teachers and schools need (of course) more money! Yet he sends his daughters to a private school.

-- His intended aim is to raise taxes to create some kind of utopia, but everyone in his cabinet is a tax cheat. But they are the almighty politicians, our great and wise leaders. They don't have to pay taxes. Only we do. But I guess now it seems we're picking up their slack. There's nothing so sublime as getting a lecture on how important it is to pay taxes by people who don't pay theirs. My question is, if these people weren't nominated to be in Obama's cabinet, how would we know about their tax problems? Perhaps every American, one after the other, could be "vetted" for his cabinet, thereby getting all the unpaid taxes, and that would stimulate the economy. But then again most Americans actually pay their taxes, something the Obama team finds confusing.

-- His big catchphrase was "hope and change". His version of this phrase apparently means hiring all the old Clintonite hacks. But more importantly, with the way the economy is right now, people are increasingly hopeless and all they're left with is a few cents in change.

His condescending, pedantic and unbelievably arrogant tone apparently doesn't bother most people. They just accept it because he is our messiah. His word is the law. Literally! He knows how to spend our money better than we do. Just HOW he knows this is not clear. Unmindful of the political cesspools in which he was politically reared, mainly due to a sympathetic media (whose "fair and balanced" approach venerated our golden god and savaged Sarah Palin at every possible chance), He was elected into office and now leads our country and our world.

Forget the fact that there literally isn't enough money in the world to support his pie-in-the-sky liberal dream projects. HE doesn't suffer through recessions. He only suffers when he can't get his liberal policies passed. The so-called "evil rich people"(i.e. Hollywood celebrities and others that helped get him elected) that create jobs and make 250,000 or more will now, out of fear of paying even MORE taxes under Obama, will try to spend 249,000 or less, thereby reducing productivity and jobs. This stunts the economy. But our almighty messiah is always right and he knows what will and what won't stimulate our economy. Spending money was the problem, so, frighteningly true to his diehard liberal beliefs, obviously throwing more money at it will solve the problem.

I know I'm leaving out a lot of contradictions, hypocrisies and outright lies, so feel free to write in if you think of any others. Also, even though liberals claim to be for free speech, they only like it when it supports their cause. They support the so-called "fairness" doctrine because they cannot compete in the marketplace of talk radio, so, naturally, they whine to their mommy, the government, "That's not fair!!!" (hence the name of their beloved doctrine). So even thought the people and the market has decided, they reject that view and think there should be government-mandated "fairness". So do write in if you have any other suggestions for the above list, before this blog magically disappears.

Election Coverage, Part 2

I know what I'm about to write isn't very new or original, but in the interest of keeping up with the times and creating new blog posts, I have decided to weigh in on the democratic "issues" going on right now.

Hillary Clinton and the claim of "sniper fire": Wait...A Clinton is LYING? Stop the presses! No one should be at all surprised about this. Except maybe the fact that she's still doing it all these years and hasn't learned her lesson. That's pretty surprising. Especially when there is VIDEO to prove her false statements. That, and Sinbad. God bless Sinbad. Just when the world is drowning in uncertainty, Sinbad comes along to show us all the way. Supposedly, when Sinbad refuted Hillary's claims of Sniper Fire, she said derisively, "he's just a comedian". This is so insulting and angering. Not only was he good enough to go with her to Bosnia in 1996 being "just a comedian" (unless she planned to use him as a human shield in case things got rough, I wouldn't put it past her), but that's assuming, because he is a comedian, he is incapable of telling the truth...he must be JOKING!!!!! He does nothing but joke (i.e. LIE) only when it comes to HER of course...well, when he has the sheer audacity to tell the truth, backed up by videotape, every single soldier involved, and all other witnesses...but he's "just a comedian", so, listen to me and not him...or anyone else. Arggghhh! Where are the snipers when you REALLY need them? Also, it is insulting to the American soldiers involved that worked so hard to make sure everything went off without a hitch and was safe for her and Chelsea (another sure sign of danger: throw my daughter and the comedian into the line of fire!). But since when has she cared about the troops except when it has been politically expedient? (that goes for all liberals by the way).But it's not the first time she used Chelsea in a lie: she said she was jogging around the World Trade Center on 9/11 and ducked into a coffee shop and was saved...that was a lie, Chelsea said herself she was in bed and saw it on TV, she said she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, but her date of birth and his accomplishments do not match...and let's not forget about all the scandals, especially the ones involving releasing her records...I could go on all day, the point is, the Clintons LIE and MAKE THINGS UP! When are more people going to see this? How many lies do they have to tell?

And this claim of "misspeaking" is so bogus..."misspeaking" is saying "thee" instead of "the". Hillary was CAUGHT IN A LIE. That's not what misspeaking is. That's just not the definition of the word. She's hoping she can fool us by repeating the same thing over and over again. As Hitler said, "if you repeat a lie enough times, people will eventually believe it." Since when has saying "I misspoke" been an out for simply lying? And how do you explain her "misspeaking" not once, not twice, but THREE times? She said she'd "told the story so many times", you'd think she'd have the truthful version by now. Telling a story many times is also not an out for a lie. Neither is saying you're "tired". A. You're running for president. You should be tired. B. If you are shot at by snipers, I don't care how tired you are, you will remember the truth and C. If she is ever tired if, god help us all, she is elected president, like, say, in the middle of the night, is there no accountability for her lies? Just a lack of sleep will now suffice? That's just the thing about Hillary. It is insulting to the intelligence of the American people the way she just makes stuff up and expects us all to swallow her lies, and when she inevitably gets caught, her lame excuses.
We can all see what's going on here. She has claimed to have "experience". Since she doesn't, she thinks she can manufacture some. She is trying to compete with John McCain's ACTUAL experience. This is a pathetic display of desperation. She lied about having experience, now has to lie to try in vain to prove it. What a tangled web we weave. This is just typical Clinton: lies on top of lies.



Obama's "pastor disaster": for a "post-racial" candidate, maybe the best idea is not to have a black racist as your "spiritual advisor". So for the past 20 plus years, in a very close relationship with Pastor Wright, he had no idea of his fanatical racist and anti-American ravings. Either he's lying, or not very perceptive. Either way, he's not fit to be president. We are judged by the company we keep. Put this together with his "rite of passage" to visit with William Ayers, the domestic terrorist who bombed, or attempted to bomb several government buildings including the pentagon and recently said "I wish I had done more", his wife's claim that she is proud of her country for the first time now, and his refusal to wear an American flag pin, as well as his willingness to bomb our allies, and grossly inflating death tolls that he got from far left smear sites, what we have is the picture of an ultra-liberal neophyte who is trying to hide this fact from the American people because if his true colors show, he won't be elected. He has accepted no hard-news interviews as of yet. He just says "change" over and over again and dances on "Ellen". We can't be THAT stupid to elect him...can we?
And then there's that NAME again...

I am against illegal immigration

My first question when it comes to the subject of "illegal immigration" is: why are we even debating this? Why is it even on the national/international radar of something that people are now arguing about? It has the word "ILLEGAL" IN the thing you are arguing about! This must be a debate all-time first. No one usually debates "illegal murder" or "illegal robbery" -- this has not yet come up, though thanks to political correctness, it may one day. That may sound crazy, but I bet we'd never see the day that we'd be debating "Illegal immigration", that there would be people that are FOR something with the word ILLEGAL in the very thing they are debating for. That would seem too crazy. But apparently it is true. These people believe our country would be better off if the rule of law was thrown out the window, despite the fact that it has served us pretty well the past couple of hundred years.
I would like to make it clear that I am all for foreigners coming here, but you have to follow a couple of simple rules: Do it legally, get a job, don't commit any crimes, and learn English. (I'm not saying you have to forget your other language, just know English as well. Even if I were to go to a foreign country for a short visit, I would try to learn some of the words and phrases. If you want to LIVE here for the rest of your life, there's really no excuse). If you follow these basic rules, I welcome you with open arms. Apparently this is asking way too much and certain rich white liberals would find that statement offensive.
If foreigners come here illegally, it is a slap in the face to all the ones who patiently waited in line and took the test and did it legally. It is an insult to all the other foreigners, or former foreigners, that respect this country enough to do it right.
I guess the thing that offends me the most about illegal immigration (despite the fact that it is illegal, let's not lose sight of that), is that: They want to come here because this country is a great place to live and much better than the country they are fleeing. But yet they do not respect our laws, which is how this country GOT to be the country they want to come to in the first place.

What makes a country a country are rules and laws and, of course, its borders. If America never had any laws or borders, it wouldn't be such a hot place to live and the illegals would not want to come here as badly, if at all, for the opportunities they see here. They can't have it both ways. They can't want to live here and keep this country great, and work here, much less get government money, yet come here illegally. They can't have their cake and eat it too.
More than that, the ones that come here illegally and then proceed to commit crimes, clog up the legal system, and then the jails which we pay for. And the welfare and handouts which we pay for. People that should not be here in the first place. And liberals defend this despite the fact that they've never spoken to an illegal or met one in person, except maybe their gardener.
I know this is "a country of immigrants" and "we are all immigrants" and all that, and that's fine, I know that already. But generations ago, when our forefathers came here, they came through Ellis Island and "Signed the Book". They did not sneak in, with a total disrespect for our laws and all that makes this country great, yet demanding all the perks that America has to offer. At least mine didn't.
It is that duplicitous, two-faced, ungrateful nature of illegal immigration I hate so much. I don't feel I am going out on a limb here, taking the wild, crazy stance of being AGAINST something Illegal. WOW! Imagine that! What a wacky point of view! "are you sure he said AGAINST illegals? What a nutjob! Where'd he get those crazy notions?"